<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why we use the MOD Template</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ericfaerber.com/2005/07/23/why-we-use-the-mod-template/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ericfaerber.com/2005/07/23/why-we-use-the-mod-template/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sascha Carlin</title>
		<link>http://www.ericfaerber.com/2005/07/23/why-we-use-the-mod-template/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Sascha Carlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.best-dev.com/2005/07/23/why-we-use-the-mod-template/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Agreed. But nevertheless it wouldn't be too bad if MOD authors could 'officially' provide a regular patch file for usage by advanced users. Manually applying some huge MODs is a royal PITA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. But nevertheless it wouldn&#8217;t be too bad if MOD authors could &#8216;officially&#8217; provide a regular patch file for usage by advanced users. Manually applying some huge MODs is a royal PITA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
